True, he with his experiences would be one of the few who would be really frustrated with the mix up knowing that both theories can be true. Having an old roommate who is open to all sorts of ideas and theories with as much genius as himself would be very useful.
And I wonder whenever Adam has heard of the stargate or the aliens before when he was young. I think Daniel would startled to discover just which organization his friend joined that required a secrecy oath and just how old are the records the Watchers keep because Joe says it was created when Gilgamesh came back to life and I have no idea how long ago that was... so the older records might be very interesting for a young archaeologist who wants to discover secrets and is open minded.
I can imagine what people overhearing would be very frustrated by the academical discussions when they were hoping for them to exchange never before heard stories and they start on language mutations and how some obscure superstition might or might not have been the origin of a specific hindu word which seems to be connected to barbarian dialect which borrowed early Egyptian syntaxes.
If someone was worried about the security breach the discussion might pose they would be very relieved and confused by why exactly would anyone care about it, and how was he going to put it in the report.
Well the two of them would have to be vague about what they say, and could just imply that the source is in some records that their respective organizations hold. And since both know that the other can't discussion the job they would understand not mentioning where did some insight or another come from. And it might explain the lack of stories told, with another genius to analyze your words lying about a story would be risky, and on the other hand discussing evolution of pottery both safe and fun (for them anyway)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 10:35 pm (UTC)And I wonder whenever Adam has heard of the stargate or the aliens before when he was young. I think Daniel would startled to discover just which organization his friend joined that required a secrecy oath and just how old are the records the Watchers keep because Joe says it was created when Gilgamesh came back to life and I have no idea how long ago that was... so the older records might be very interesting for a young archaeologist who wants to discover secrets and is open minded.
I can imagine what people overhearing would be very frustrated by the academical discussions when they were hoping for them to exchange never before heard stories and they start on language mutations and how some obscure superstition might or might not have been the origin of a specific hindu word which seems to be connected to barbarian dialect which borrowed early Egyptian syntaxes.
If someone was worried about the security breach the discussion might pose they would be very relieved and confused by why exactly would anyone care about it, and how was he going to put it in the report.
Well the two of them would have to be vague about what they say, and could just imply that the source is in some records that their respective organizations hold. And since both know that the other can't discussion the job they would understand not mentioning where did some insight or another come from. And it might explain the lack of stories told, with another genius to analyze your words lying about a story would be risky, and on the other hand discussing evolution of pottery both safe and fun (for them anyway)